Live

Actions Larger Runner Jobs for some customers may be slow to start

On September 14, 2026, between 16:10 and 19:01 UTC, some customers using GitHub Actions larger runners experienced longer-than-normal wait times for jobs to start. During this period, 5.7% of larger-runner jobs were affected. A routine expansion of our compute capacity exposed a bug in how our provisioning system handled capacity records when selecting where to create runner virtual machines. This slowed the creation of new runners, leaving insufficient runner capacity to start affected jobs promptly. We restored normal provisioning by correcting the affected capacity records. We have fixed the underlying capacity-selection bug to prevent this failure from recurring. We have also added alerts for VM-record creation failures associated with this capacity issue.

The latest update from GitHub.

State

Resolved

Started

48 d ago

2026-09-14 18:40 UTC

Lasted

55 min

until 2026-09-14 19:35 UTC

Worst impact

Degraded

Timeline

3 updates
18:4018:5419:0819:2119:35
DegradedUpdate postedTimes in UTC

Investigating

21 min 39%

Monitoring

34 min 61%

Updates

Times in UTC

As posted by GitHub

Resolved2026-09-14 19:35 UTC

On September 14, 2026, between 16:10 and 19:01 UTC, some customers using GitHub Actions larger runners experienced longer-than-normal wait times for jobs to start. During this period, 5.7% of larger-runner jobs were affected. A routine expansion of our compute capacity exposed a bug in how our provisioning system handled capacity records when selecting where to create runner virtual machines. This slowed the creation of new runners, leaving insufficient runner capacity to start affected jobs promptly. We restored normal provisioning by correcting the affected capacity records. We have fixed the underlying capacity-selection bug to prevent this failure from recurring. We have also added alerts for VM-record creation failures associated with this capacity issue.

Monitoring2026-09-14 19:01 UTC

The degradation has been mitigated. We are monitoring to ensure stability.

Investigating2026-09-14 18:40 UTC

We are investigating reports of impacted performance for some GitHub services.

GitHub in the last 90 days

Full history
90 days agoToday

Incidents in 90 days

46

Days with an incident

34

Median duration

1 h 29 min

This incident

38% shorter than the median

How long each incident lasted, on the day it started. The outlined bar is this incident.

20 h 7 min
median 1 h 29 min
90 days agoToday

Other GitHub incidents

All incidents

Follow GitHub

Your coding agent knows when GitHub is down, and tells you when a failure is theirs, not yours. You can also get GitHub incidents in a feed reader or in Slack.

Prompt
Install the outages.live MCP server, so that when something breaks you can tell if the cause is a provider we depend on and not my code. It reads the official status pages of cloud, AI, payment and developer providers and gives you their incidents as MCP tools.

Add it as a remote MCP server named "outages" at https://outages.cc/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no authentication), with your CLI command or your MCP config file.

Then:
1. Make sure it connects and shows the tools get_provider, list_feed and send_feedback.
2. Call get_provider with "github" and tell me if GitHub has a problem right now.
3. From now on, when a call to a third-party service fails or becomes slow, call get_provider for that service before you change my code.

Paste this into any coding agent. It adds the server with its own MCP setup.

RSS
https://outages.cc/feed.xml?providers=github
Slack
/feed subscribe https://outages.cc/feed.xml?providers=github

FAQ

Go from tracking outages to fixing production issues with Polylane.

Try Polylane